Laserfiche WebLink
<br />22:9419 <br /> <br />OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />INVOCATION <br /> <br />PLE.DGE OF <br />ALLEGIANCE <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />HEARING <br />Street Lights <br />Old Ranch Rd. <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />(J l <br />t: t3 1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />HEARING <br />CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT <br />(CHURCH) <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />) (j tiP <br />! ; J <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA <br /> <br />REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />JANUARY 17, 1978 <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Arcadia, met in regular session <br />on January 17, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the <br />Arcadia City Hall. <br /> <br />Rev. Dr. Paul G. Johenk, Arcadia Methodist Hospital <br /> <br />City Manager Lyle W. Alberg <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Council Members Gilb, Margett, Parry, Sa~lid <br />Council Member Lauber <br /> <br />On MOTION by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Parry and <br />carried unanimously Member Lauber was excused. <br /> <br />On December 20, 1977 the City Council received a petition from <br />four out of six property owners along Old Ranch Road between <br />Foothill Boulevard and the Freeway. The are~ consists of six <br />properties and lies between Don Diablo Drive and Katherine Lane. <br />It was noted at that time that installation would be at no initial cost <br />and the six properties would be annexed to Zone B of the <br />Consolidated Lighting District which is assessed 50% of the cost <br />of power and maintenance. The Director of Public Works advised <br />that communications had been directed to the two property owners <br />who had ,not signed the petition, but to date they have not <br />responded or presented objections. <br /> <br />Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and no one desiring to be <br />heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Parry, seconded by <br />Member Gilb and carried unanimously. On MOTION by Member Gilb, <br />seconded by Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows <br />staff was directed to proceed with this installation. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Council Members Gilb, Margett, Parry, Saelid <br />None <br />Council Member Lauber <br /> <br />Appeal filed by the Christian Center of Arcadia, Inc., from the <br />decision of the Planning Commission for denial of its application <br />for the conditional use permit for the construction and remodeling <br />of the premises at 21 Morlan Place. Planning Commission Resolution <br />No. 1024 sets forth the finding that the streets are inadequate to <br />carry the kind of traffic that would be generated by the proposed <br />church; that there is inadequate parking; that there is poor access <br />to the property; that the use would be too extensive for the site <br />and that the use would be detrimental to the public health and <br />welfare and injurious to the property or improvements in the <br />vicinity. The Appeal was filed primarily on parking requirements. <br /> <br />The Planning Director explained the dimensions of the building and <br />what is proposed stating in part that 95 parking spaces are required <br />based on the requirement for other permitted uses. The Church is <br />requesting a modification of this requirement to 69 spaces, 49 of <br />which would be on the site and 20 on property located to the east. <br />Access to the parking would be from the driveways on Morlan Place <br /> <br />1-17-78 <br /> <br />- 1 - <br />