Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Ordinance <br />No. 1089 - <br />Continued) <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br />No. 3275 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />;LliDEXJ;;D <br /> <br />LOT SPLITS <br /> <br />4(p~8 <br /> <br />5o~.,.5. <br /> <br />Councilman Balser further moved that Ordinance No. 1089 be introduced. <br />Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion which was carried on roll <br />call vote as follows: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Balser, Butterworth, Reibold, Camphouse <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Phillips <br /> <br />The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of <br />Resolution No. 3275, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF <br />THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CERTAIN GASOLINE TAX FUNDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT <br />OF CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS IN SAID CITY OF ARCADIA." <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works commented that this covers the resurfacing of <br />Colorado from Second to Fifth Avenues, and Golden West north from <br />Huntington Drive to its terminus. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Balser and carried <br />on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of <br />Resolution No. 3275 be waived: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Balser, Butterworth, Reibold, Camphouse <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Phillips <br /> <br />Councilman Reibold further moved that Resolution No. 3275 be adopted, <br />Motion seconded by Councilman Balser and carried on roll call vote as <br />follows: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Balser, Butterworth, Reibold, Camphouse <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Phillips <br /> <br />No. 288 - Ray DuShane, 42 West Grandview Avenue <br />No. 289 - Ethel Ziegler, 34 West Grandview Avenue <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works advised that the above related lot splits were <br />recommended for approval, subject to certain conditions; that condition 7 <br />was to add 15 feet more ground to Lot split 289 to make the lot 100 feet <br />wide. However, at the Council meeting of April 5, 1960, Mr. Ziegler stated <br />that the additional 15 feet on No. 289 would unreasonably reduce the avail- <br />able yard area; also that Mr. Dushane had stated that the cul de sac was <br />taking too much of his land. That the matter was held to give the owners <br />an opportunity to work out details. <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works continued that he and the Planning Secretary <br />)XUDE4Enhad visited the Ziegler property and were inclined to agree with the owner <br />that the 15 foot strip was desirable to be left with the north portion of <br />the lot; that with regard to the cul de sac a redesign was made, the curve <br />of the curb line was started further south in the old portion of the El Vista <br />Circle, thus not extending so far into the new lots and that he had approved <br />this design. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Recommendation of the Director of Public Works that since the new lot on the <br />Ziegler property will contain an area of 7936 square feet after the street <br />dedication (minimum lot depth approximately 76') and the DuShane lot contains <br />16,768 square feet (above required minimum), said lot splits be approved, <br />subject to all the conditions specified on March 22,1960 except No.7, as <br />follows: <br /> <br />1. File a final map for each lot split with the City Engineer. <br />2. Provide a sewer lateral for each lot split. <br />3. Dedicate 5 feet for widening of Grandview Avenue along each lot. <br />4. Dedicate a standard 40' radius cul de sac for extension of El Vista Circle. <br />5. The cuI de sac at El Vista Circle shall be improved with standard curb, <br />gutter, pavement, water service and sewer service. <br />6. Pay $25.00 recreation fee for each lot split. <br />7. The City shall accept the offer of "future street" at the present end <br />of El Vista Circle. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />7-5-60 <br />