Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I,,,,,,,,,,, <br /> <br />PLEDGE OF <br />ALLEGIANCE <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />MINUTE <br />APPROVAL <br />(8-3-65) <br /> <br />ZONE CHANGE <br />(Santa Anita & <br />Las Tunas) <br /> <br />Continued to <br />September 21, <br />1965 <br /> <br />(F:352) <br /> <br />APPEAL <br />(Lot Split) <br /> <br />Barrett <br /> <br />Approved <br />(P:Lot Splits) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />16:6614 <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA <br /> <br />REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />AUGUST 17, 1965 <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in <br />the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M., August 17, 1965. <br /> <br />Reverend Fred Diemer, Arcadia Christian Reformed Church <br /> <br />Mayor Conrad T. Reibold <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Considine, Turner, Reibold <br />Councilman Forman <br /> <br />The Minutes of the regular meeting of August 3, 1965 were APPROVED on <br />MOTION by Councilman Turner, seconded by Councilman Considine and <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Reibold declared the hearing open on Planning Commission <br />Resolution No. 555 recommending denial of an application filed by the <br />Republic Capital Corporation on property at the northwest corner of <br />Santa Anita Avenue and Las Tunas Drive from Zone R-l, R-2 and R-3 to <br />Zone C-3. <br /> <br />It was noted that, due to illness, the applicant had requested a <br />continuation of the matter and no one desiring to be heard, it was <br />MOVED by Councilman Turner, seconded by Councilman Considine and <br />carried unanimously that the public hearing be continued until the <br />regular meeting of September 21, 1965. <br /> <br />The recommendation of the Planning Commission for denial of an <br />application filed by Mr. and Mrs. C. Robert Barrett requesting per- <br />mission to divide their property at 205 W. Walnut Avenue was appealed <br />by the applicants. <br /> <br />The Planning Director advised that the Commission had determined that <br />the proposed lot deviated sufficiently from the Zone R-O requirements <br />to warrant the denial. Projecturals were displayed and reviewed in <br />detail showing the location of the improvements thereon. The <br />proposed lot would be 118.97' x 110' which deviates 6' from the <br />requirements. <br /> <br />The applicants addressed the City Council requesting favorable_ <br />consideration and s ta te d that the subject property is diffrz-ult to <br />maintain and is unsightly; that it would enhance the area inasmuch as <br />it is located on a corner with the new lot to front on El Monte Avenu~ <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that the advantages of an <br />improved lot at this location would outweigh the slight deviation <br />from the code requirements and the following minute resolution was <br />unanimousLy adopted on MOTION by Councilman Turner, seconded by <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />8-17-65 <br />