Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I '",,""An" <br /> <br />PLEDGE OF <br />ALLEGIANCE <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br />NO. 3794 <br /> <br />HEARING <br />(Zoning) <br /> <br />J- III 0 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />16:6549 <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA <br /> <br />REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />JUNE 1, 1965 <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in the <br />Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M., June 1, 1965. <br /> <br />Dr. Dale F. Reynolds, Community Foursquare Church <br /> <br />Mayor Conrad T. Reibold <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Turner, Reibold <br />None <br /> <br />Councilman Turner read in its entirety. Resolution No. 3794, <br />commemorating the public service of the late Kenneth R. Mergen, <br />entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, <br />CALIFORNIA, MEMORIALIZING KENNETH R. MERGEN". <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilman Turner, seconded by. Councilman Considine <br />and carried on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 3794 be <br />ADOPTED. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Turner, Reibold <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />The City Council continued the hearing on the application of <br />Donald P. Mc Cormac for a commercial rubbish pickup permit. The <br />matter had been continued from the regular City Council meeting of <br />April 16, 1965. Pursuant to the request' of the City Council the <br />City Manager presented a staff report which set forth the number of <br />accounts served by each of the five licensees operating within the <br />City at present. He noted that Section 6434.2 of the Arcadia <br />Municipal Code states that, "No more than five permits for said <br />pickup shall be in effect at anyone time". <br /> <br />Gene Gregg, attorney for the applicant, stated in part that it <br />appears from the report that at least two of the licensees are not <br />engaged in competition inasmuch as they each have one account, that <br />of a supermarket in both instances; that in his opinion if it is the <br />intent of the City Council to limit to five the number of licensees, <br />why not limit it to one - that of the City Refuse Service Company <br />which serves 35 commercial accounts in the City. If the intent, <br />however, is to permit open free competition then the regulation <br />should be broadened to so permit; that from the report there are <br />only three companies working in competition; that he is not recom- <br />mending the cancellation of any of the existing licensees; that the <br />ordinance should be broadened to a number in excess of five if this <br />is the intent of the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilman Turner stated in part that as he has voiced on other <br />occasions he is opposed to limiting private enterprise; however, <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />6-1-65 <br />