Laserfiche WebLink
<br />16:6317' <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA <br /> <br />ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />JULY 27;,1964 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Pursuant to the order of adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting <br />of the City Council 'of July 21, 1964, the City Council of the City of <br />Arcadia met in adjourned regular session in the Council Chamber of <br />the City Hall at 8:00 P.M., July 27, 1964. <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner <br />None <br /> <br />P: <br /> <br />Planning Commission Resolution No. 520 recommending the granting of <br />a variance to permit the filling of an abandoned gravel pit upon <br />specified conditions. (Property located on the north side of Clarke <br />Street east of Peck Road). <br /> <br />LIAI~~,rt ~as explained that the subject property consists for the most part <br />of an abandoned gravel pit, the quarrying operations have been <br />completed and it is now proposed to be filled with inert material; <br />that it is now totally unfit for any surface use and the property in <br />order to be usable must be brought up to grade. <br /> <br />GRAVEL <br />PIT FILL <br /> <br />No ~ritten appeal having been filed and no one desiring to be heard, <br />MOTION by Councilman Balser, seconded by Councilman Forman and <br />carried unanimously that the recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission as contained in its Resolution No. 520 be APPROVED in <br />acc~rdance with the conditions specified therein with the added <br />condition that all fill must be inert material as described in the <br />regulations of the Regional Water Pollution Control Board standards <br />and specifications. <br /> <br />TRACT <br />NO. 23146 <br /> <br />p ~ ~..{;dA' <br /> <br />The Planning Director explained reasons for the recommendation of the <br />Planning Commission for denial of the proposed subdivision in the <br />vicinity of Second Avenue and La Sierra Drive. It was the opinion <br />of the Commission that the tract as proposed would preclude the future <br />orderly development of cul-de-sacs in the area. The Commission had <br />suggested that the subdivision be moved one lot to the north or to the <br />south, with which the developer could not comply inasmuch as the <br />necessary property was not available at the' present time. <br /> <br />(Tentative Map <br />Disapproved) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Alfred Allen, representing the subdivider, explained how in his <br />opinion the development could proceed under City standards. <br /> <br />It ~as the consensus of the City Council that to approve the <br />tentative map of Tract No. 23146 would preclude the future develop- <br />ment of the land to its highest use, whereupon Councilman Forman <br />MOVED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be sustained <br />and that tentative map of Tract No. 23146 be disapproved. Motion <br />seconded by Councilman Balser and carried on roll call vote as <br />fo llows: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />7-27-64 <br />