Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1"0",,,00 <br /> <br /> <br />PLEDGE OF <br />ALLEGIANCE <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />HEARING <br />(Clarke) <br />, <br /> <br />(F 1035) <br /> <br />INDEXED <br /> <br />I: <br /> <br />16:6212 <br /> <br />M I NUT E S <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA <br /> <br />APRIL 7, 1964 <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular <br />session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall on April 7, 1964 at <br />8 P.M. <br /> <br />Rev. Eugene E. Collins, Arcadia Friends Church <br /> <br />Mayor Elton D. Phillips <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Councilmen Balser, Butterworth, Reibold, Turner, Phillips <br />None <br /> <br />MOTION by Councilman Turner, seconded by Councilman Reibold and <br />carried unanimously that the Minutes of March 17, 1964 be APPROVED as <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Application of James W. Clarke, dba Arcadia Directory Company, re- <br />questing business permit to allow door to door solicitation of <br />residents for pertinent data to be included in a city directory and <br />the door to door solicitation of merchants for advertising to be <br />included in said directory. <br /> <br />Mayor Phillips declared the hearing open and inquired if anyone <br />desired to speak on the subject matter. <br /> <br />Applicant, Mr. Clarke, identified himself from the audience. <br /> <br />Discussion held by the Councilmen with Councilman Butterworth stating <br />in part ~hat in voting for an antisolicitation ordinance the residents <br />clearly indicated they do not desire to be disturbed by door to door <br />solicitors; that in his opinion this desire must be respected. <br /> <br />Discussion held on whether or not two permits are required, one for <br />the solicitation of residents and a separate one for the solicitation <br />of merchants for advertising for inclusion in the directory which <br />would be presented free of charge to the residents, but would be used <br />by the merchants of the city. The City Manager advised that the <br />Chamber of Commerce had endorsed the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Clarke addressed the Council, summarizing the procedure. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council being that the overwhelming vote of the <br />people for antisolicitation regulation should be respected, MOTION <br />was made by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Balser and <br />carried on roll call vote as follows that the application be denied. <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Balser, Butterworth, Reibold, Turner, ,Phillips <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />4-7-64 <br />